Hillary and the Media: Under Enemy Fire {updated}

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

In Time, Mark Halperin provides a list of “Painful Things Hillary Clinton Knows—Or Should Know.”

No. 7:“The Rev. Wright story notwithstanding, the media still wants Obama to be the nominee—and that has an impact every day.”

We’ve come full circle. From destroying Gore in 2000, then demanding that he withdraw during the Florida recount, so confident have the Beltway media courtiers grown in their social and political status that what once was furiously denied is now boasted about. Politicians may come and go, but Chris Matthews, Howard Fineman, Tim Russert and Maureen Dowd preside over a permanent House of Lords. Remember, its the same media who attack Hillary now, attacked Gore in the same way then. The same media who now say Hillry must get out of this race for "the good of the Party", said in 2000 that Gore must quit and give he White House to Bush "for the good of the Nation".

And some foolish Democrats are listening to these fools. Why?

HAVE OBAMA PEOPLE BECOME THE SAME AS THE 2000 CLINTON/GORE HATING MEDIA. TOO ME, IT LOOKS LIKE THEY'VE BEEN CLONED.

Same attacks, same fake charges, same fake outrage, same motives...

----

Fox calls it "snipergate". It's all over the media. What began with a few bloggers, pushing a questionable youtube video with silly juxtapositions, made it into Fox, ABC, and now every major daily throughout the country. Obama's gangster's couldn't help themselves and are now dowsing the fire with propane.

As the major media outlets fall head-over-heals to slaughter Clinton fatale, not one is reporting the story correctly. It's the story of the century. "Hillary a Liar" "Hillary Caught" "Hillary Gaffe".

Welcome back to Hillary Season - we're back from our Spring break, back hunting Clintons - 2008 is Hillary season.

All the noise over another DailyKos orchestrated wave of propaganda: Hillary the Anti-Christ.

The entire media hoop-la over Clinton's "misstatement" is fabricated. What started with an inane video-posting, has been taken up by a vehemently anti-Hillary media, and when Wolfson mentioned "misstatement" in a daily conference call, bang- plastered all over the place.

That's fabrication, from start to finish, and with clear malicious intent. Just like when the Obama team dug up Ferraro's race statement in some far away local newspaper, and then pushed it into the airwaves. Fabricated from start to finish .

Any clearheaded reading of the Clinton camps statement on Bosnia, is pretty relaxing:

Clinton said I remember landing under sniper fire and that the welcoming ceremony had to be moved inside because of sniper fire.

All evidence from the time, as Wolfson made clear, documented sniper fire in the hills. How does that make "landing under sniper fire" a misstatement?

Is our national media seriously considering we take the words of Sinbad more seriously than Clinton, Wolfson, and contemporaneous reports all put together?

When the character of a Democratic candidate is held in lower regard than the mutterings of a flaky comedian gone AWOL in his military duty, you don't need do second-guess yourself- you are seeing bias at work.

*

The issue about the duration of the ceremony on the tarmac, is a non-issue. The YouTube video provides no evidence that the ceremony wasn`t in fact shorter than planned, nor does it devote any attention to the subject of whether and where such a ceremony continued during the day. It is a crappy internet video, with no relevant information, and open only to speculative conjectural interpretation by the types who believe in UFOs. To present their amateurish misinterpretations as proof of lying, misleading, and or exaggeration on Hillary's part, is daft. To do so at the national broadcasting level, is more than daft, or irresponsible, it is propaganda in its most brutal form.

The intent is all too clear- to not only provide Obama with the wherewithal of destroying Hillary's character, a wherewithal only the media posses, but to destroy Hillary's ability to make experience relevant to this Democratic Primary.

The media has already achieved a similar objective with "issues." When health care and NAFTA began to cause its dear wonderboy so much Obama anxiety, when it became painfully clear that "issues" were not his forte, suddenly coverage shifted to race-baiting. Who cares whether Obama lied on Goldsby and NAFTA, or Powers and Iraq?

I sincerely wish Obama's media whores and populous sheep, applied the same standards of integrity and honesty to Obama- that they've been applying to Hillary from about 2004.

Or wait, they can't do that- because unlike Hillary Obama has no experience of which to speak, hence nothing to ridicule? Passed 2 bills, did not convene a single meeting of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on NATO and Afghanistan and lost all his Chicago Senate papers? Attaboy.

Well, we know what they media said about those 11,000 pages of Hillary experience. Stained Blue Dress day anyone?

How is that for media objectivity? Hillary releases documents of her policy experience and the media bring up Lewinsky. Hillary talks about traveling to foreign countries, and the only thing making headlines is one misstatement distorted by the media into some kind of denunciation of Hillary's entire character.

And just in time to coincide with Obama's declared attack on Hillary's character?  Coincidence?

Newsflash! People and politicans exaggerate.

Lets all faint together in feigned shock!

Hell, Obama's lied a slew of times so far in this race, big deal, so what? (not that I care, but some are listed below to show how it is)

Whats shocking is one dem's campaign callng another dem a liar in the media.

Only one other Dem has ever done that before this.

That selfish fool bradley did this in 2000 and he set up the entire Gore is a liar media campaign.

Reemember, the same exact media players who did this to Gore are now doing this to Hillary.

WAY TO GO OBAMAITES!

You are becoming exactly what weve been fighting against since 2000.

FROM TALK LEFT:Obama's Exaggerations

http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/3/27/ 212716/396

Just Embellished Words: Senator Obama's Record of Exaggerations & Misstatements

Once again, the Obama campaign is getting caught saying one thing while doing another. They are personally attacking Hillary even though Sen. Obama has been found mispeaking and embellishing facts about himself more than ten times in recent months. Senator Obama's campaign is based on words - not a record of deeds - and if those words aren't backed up by facts, there's not much else left.

"Senator Obama has called himself a constitutional professor, claimed credit for passing legislation that never left committee, and apparently inflated his role as a community organizer among other issues. When it comes to his record, just words won't do. Senator Obama will have to use facts as well," Clinton spokesman Phil Singer said.

Sen. Obama consistently and falsely claims that he was a law professor. The Sun-Times reported that, "Several direct-mail pieces issued for Obama's primary [Senate] campaign said he was a law professor at the University of Chicago. He is not. He is a senior lecturer (now on leave) at the school. In academia, there is a vast difference between the two titles. Details matter." In academia, there's a significant difference: professors have tenure while lecturers do not. [Hotline Blog, 4/9/07; Chicago Sun-Times, 8/8/04]

Obama claimed credit for nuclear leak legislation that never passed. "Obama scolded Exelon and federal regulators for inaction and introduced a bill to require all plant owners to notify state and local authorities immediately of even small leaks. He has boasted of it on the campaign trail, telling a crowd in Iowa in December that it was 'the only nuclear legislation that Iâ€<sup>TM</sup>ve passed.' 'I just did that last year,' he said, to murmurs of approval. A close look at the path his legislation took tells a very different story. While he initially fought to advance his bill, even holding up a presidential nomination to try to force a hearing on it, Mr. Obama eventually rewrote it to reflect changes sought by Senate Republicans, Exelon and nuclear regulators. The new bill removed language mandating prompt reporting and simply offered guidance to regulators, whom it charged with addressing the issue of unreported leaks. Those revisions propelled the bill through a crucial committee. But, contrary to Mr. Obamaâ€<sup>TM</sup>s comments in Iowa, it ultimately died amid parliamentary wrangling in the full Senate." [New York Times, 2/2/08]

Obama misspoke about his being conceived because of Selma. â€oeMr. Obama relayed a story of how his Kenyan father and his Kansan mother fell in love because of the tumult of Selma, but he was born in 1961, four years before the confrontation at Selma took place. When asked later, Mr. Obama clarified himself, saying: â€<sup>~</sup>I meant the whole civil rights movement.â€<sup>TM</sup>” [New York Times, 3/5/07]

LA Times: Fellow organizers say Sen. Obama took too much credit for his community organizing efforts. "As the 24-year-old mentor to public housing residents, Obama says he initiated and led efforts that thrust Altgeld's asbestos problem into the headlines, pushing city officials to call hearings and a reluctant housing authority to start a cleanup. But others tell the story much differently. They say Obama did not play the singular role in the asbestos episode that he portrays in the best-selling memoir 'Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance.' Credit for pushing officials to deal with the cancer-causing substance, according to interviews and news accounts from that period, also goes to a well-known preexisting group at Altgeld Gardens and to a local newspaper called the Chicago Reporter. Obama does not mention either one in his book." [Los Angeles Times, 2/19/07]

Chicago Tribune: Obama's assertion that nobody had indications Rezko was engaging in wrongdoing 'strains credulity.' "…Obama has been too self-exculpatory. His assertion in network TV interviews last week that nobody had indications Rezko was engaging in wrongdoing strains credulity: Tribune stories linked Rezko to questionable fundraising for Gov. Rod Blagojevich in 2004 -- more than a year before the adjacent home and property purchases by the Obamas and the Rezkos." [Chicago Tribune editorial, 1/27/08]

Obama was forced to revise his assertion that lobbyists 'won't work in my White House.' "White House hopeful Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) was forced to revise a critical stump line of his on Saturday -- a flat declaration that lobbyists 'won't work in my White House' after it turned out his own written plan says they could, with some restrictions… After being challenged on the accuracy of what he has been saying -- in contrast to his written pledge -- at a news conference Saturday in Waterloo, Obama immediately softened what had been his hard line in his next stump speech." [Chicago Sun-Times, 12/16/07]

FactCheck.org: â€<sup>~</sup>Selective, embellished and out-of-context quotes from newspapers pump up Obama's health plan.â€<sup>TM</sup> â€oeObama's ad touting his health care plan quotes phrases from newspaper articles and an editorial, but makes them sound more laudatory and authoritative than they actually are. It attributes to The Washington Post a line saying Obama's plan would save families about $2,500. But the Post was citing the estimate of the Obama campaign and didn't analyze the purported savings independently. It claims that "experts" say Obama's plan is "the best." "Experts" turn out to be editorial writers at the Iowa City Press-Citizen â€" who, for all their talents, aren't actual experts in the field. It quotes yet another newspaper saying Obama's plan "guarantees coverage for all Americans," neglecting to mention that, as the article makes clear, it's only Clinton's and Edwards' plans that would require coverage for everyone, while Obama's would allow individuals to buy in if they wanted to.” [FactCheck.org, 1/3/08]

Sen. Obama said 'I passed a law that put Illinois on a path to universal coverage,' but Obama health care legislation merely set up a task force. "As a state senator, I brought Republicans and Democrats together to pass legislation insuring 20,000 more children. And 65,000 more adults received health care…And I passed a law that put Illinois on a path to universal coverage." The State Journal-Register reported in 2004 that "The [Illinois State] Senate squeaked out a controversial bill along party lines Wednesday to create a task force to study health-care reform in Illinois. […] In its original form, the bill required the state to offer universal health care by 2007. That put a 'cloud' over the legislation, said Sen. Dale Righter, R-Mattoon. Under the latest version, the 29-member task force would hold at least five public hearings next year." [Obama Health Care speech, 5/29/07; State Journal-Register, 5/20/04]

ABC News: 'Obama...seemed to exaggerate the legislative progress he made' on ethics reform. "ABC News' Teddy Davis Reports: During Monday's Democratic presidential debate, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., seemed to exaggerate the legislative progress he has made on disclosure of "bundlers," those individuals who aggregate their influence with the candidate they support by collecting $2,300 checks from a wide network of wealthy friends and associates. When former Alaska Sen. Mike Gravel alleged that Obama had 134 bundlers, Obama responded by telling Gravel that the reason he knows how many bundlers he has raising money for him is "because I helped push through a law this past session to disclose that." Earlier this year, Obama sponsored an amendment [sic] in the Senate requiring lobbyists to disclose the candidates for whom they bundle. Obama's amendment would not, however, require candidates to release the names of their bundlers. What's more, although Obama's amendment was agreed to in the Senate by unanimous consent, the measure never became law as Obama seemed to suggest. Gravel and the rest of the public know how many bundlers Obama has not because of a 'law' that the Illinois Democrat has 'pushed through' but because Obama voluntarily discloses that information." [ABC News, 7/23/07]

Obama drastically overstated Kansas tornado deaths during campaign appearance. When Sen. Barack Obama exaggerated the death toll of the tornado in Greensburg, Kan, during his visit to Richmond yesterday, The Associated Press headline rapidly evolved from Obama visits former Confederate capital for fundraiser to Obama rips Bush on Iraq war at Richmond fundraiser to <sup>~</sup>Weary Obama criticizes Bush on Iraq, drastically overstates Kansas tornado death toll to Obama drastically overstates Kansas tornado deaths during campaign appearance. Drudge made it a banner, ensuring no reporter would miss it. [politico.com, 5/9/07]

.



Display:


Re: under sniper fire (2.00 / 5)

Great diary.  Tell it ike it is.


On to the Convention Floor!
by oh puhleeze on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 11:51:41 AM EST

Thats not what she said. (none / 0)

"I certainly do remember that trip to Bosnia, and as Togo said, there was a saying around the White House that if a place was too small, too poor, or too dangerous, the president couldn't go, so send the First Lady. That's where we went. I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base."

Except the President had been there a month earlier (so it wasn't too dangerous for the President to go), they did have a greeting party where a small child read her a poem, she posed for group pictures, took media questions and had a meet and greet with the soldiers and the group did not have to "[run] with our heads down tp get into the vehicles to get to our base".  

And thats just part of it.  She repeated this story multiple times, telling of a "corkscrew landing" in which passengers were told to "sit on their bulletproof vests" which have been directly contradicted by the pilot as fabricated.

She lied.  


McCain = Iraq. John McCain = overturn Roe.
by PantsB on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 11:53:16 AM EST

what she said. (2.00 / 5)

miss the point huh?

flew right over your head huh?


by John Wesley Hardin was a Friend to the Poor on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 12:04:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: what she said. (2.00 / 2)

John, may i cross-post this later today at No Quarter?  E-mail me directly at susanunpc at gmail dot com ...

this is brilliant work by you.  You rock.


by susanhu on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 12:58:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: what she said. (none / 0)

sure, but

I lifted much of it from Jeff Gold at http://www.stop-obama.org/?page_id=22

but we  all are a team.


by John Wesley Hardin was a Friend to the Poor on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 03:51:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Obama lies...and in a more egregious... (none / 0)

way.  I guess we could call this "Valor Theft".  For instance:

"After weeks of arduous negotiations, on April 6, 2006, a bipartisan group of senators burst out of the "President's Room," just off the Senate chamber, with a deal on new immigration policy.

As the half-dozen senators -- including John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) -- headed to announce their plan, they met Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), who made a request common when Capitol Hill news conferences are in the offing: "Hey, guys, can I come along?" And when Obama went before the microphones, he was generous with his list of senators to congratulate -- a list that included himself.

"I want to cite Lindsey Graham, Sam Brownback, Mel Martinez, Ken Salazar, myself, Dick Durbin, Joe Lieberman . . . who've actually had to wake up early to try to hammer this stuff out," he said.

To Senate staff members, who had been arriving for 7 a.m. negotiating sessions for weeks, it was a galling moment. Those morning sessions had attracted just three to four senators a side, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) recalled, each deeply involved in the issue. Obama was not one of them."

(CBS News, 03/28/2008 - IN AN ARTICLE that primairly rehashed every word Hillary has said, too.)

I guess this is how he intends to govern as a progressive...take credit for the hard work everyone else does.


by Shazone on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 02:54:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: under sniper fire (none / 0)

Your kidding with this right? look up the multiple diaries with undeniable proof she lied  


John McCain's pick-up line is, 'Did you know that 150 is the new 130?'"
by wellinformed on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 11:56:30 AM EST

Re: under sniper fire (2.00 / 3)

DENSE HUH?


by John Wesley Hardin was a Friend to the Poor on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 12:02:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: under sniper fire (2.00 / 1)

Yes, there seem to be dozens of diaries a day repeating the smear from newsbusters. Just like in 2004 when there were dozens of diaries repeating various accounts from 'people who were there' showing John Kerry's cowardly behavior on his Swift Boat....

Oh, wait, no those diaries denounced that smear. And  even people like John McCain leaped to Kerry's defense. Funny how not even John Kerry has the integrity to defend Hillary Clinton from this crap.


by souvarine on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 12:17:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: under sniper fire (1.00 / 2)

TROLL


by giusd on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 12:01:13 PM EST

Re: under sniper fire (2.00 / 3)

KOSSACK


by John Wesley Hardin was a Friend to the Poor on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 12:02:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I have a great idea (none / 0)

Write an anti-McCain diary, it is great catharsis as you can be as uncivil as you want and no one will call you on it.

snark on
Wonderful use of the same memo that has been in several diaries (like Alegre's misstatement one) already you get a gold star, and you didn't even bother taking out the one that has been refuted by the University of Chicago that takes courage, and the picture is so related to the idea of snipers.
SNIPERS!!!
snark off

The real question should be why is this a big deal (the whole sniper thing) and the answer is it shouldn't.  We should call the press on it when makes a big deal out of an exaggeration.  That is how Al Gore lost to a chimp.


Student Guy=JoeMentum. No really Student Guy=JoeMentum, after all JoeMentum was an embarrassment so is Student Guy. This sig is FAIL!!
by Student Guy on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 12:02:52 PM EST

Sorry, no. (none / 0)

First of all, you ignore Clinton's own statements on the matter. She said they were hustled, heads down, into waiting armored vehicles.

That's what she said. More than once. In more than one place. Going back months.

That was not true, as the video clearly shows.

And, as I Wrote in this diary, Tuzla Tall Tale Cuts to Heart of Clinton's Biggest Weakness, Clinton is her own worst enemy in this case because her "misstatement" or fib or fabrication plays directly into voter's perceptions of her as being less than honest.

Then, she backtracked by claiming she was tired when she made the statement on March 17. That was untrue, as well, because the news media quickly found video of her telling the same story as far back as Iowa.

In other words, she has been telling this tall tale for months. In fact, Sinbad called her on it back in February, but the media ignored the story except for a short piece in an online blog at the Washington Post. It was only when she retold the story on March 17 that she brought the issue back to the fore.

So you can blame the media or the Obama campaign or some vast conspiracy against the Clintons, but the real blame lies with the candidate herself.

As a friend who supported Clinton until recently said to me last night, "That wasn't a misstatement. It was a lie. Period. She should just admit exaggerating it and move on."

I find it interesting that you refuse to her responsible for her own actions. It's everyone else's fault but Hillary's, right?


by Bob Johnson on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 12:07:37 PM EST

Re: Sorry, no. (1.00 / 1)

we all lie.

there's a short list of obama lies above...

BUT...only scuumbag dems call other dems LIARS.

are you a scumbag dem?


by John Wesley Hardin was a Friend to the Poor on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 12:55:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

"Scumbag Dems" (none / 0)

Ironic in a post where you essentially call Obama a liar.

Hilarious.

By the way, here's the entire chronology of video related to this story.

Enjoy!


by Bob Johnson on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 01:55:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "Scumbag Dems" (none / 0)

god you are not a supple thinker.

I said we all lie, that doesn't mean we are all liars.


by John Wesley Hardin was a Friend to the Poor on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 03:39:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

How often do you lie? (none / 0)


by Bob Johnson on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 04:55:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: under sniper fire (none / 0)

Why do you continue to not understand that Hillary told a falsehood,not once but many times.  The problem with that is she has insulted the military who were supposed to protect her, and second it shows how she is turning into Bill Clinton, with his habit of fabricating the truth.  She needs to get away from that man like yesterday.


by Spanky on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 12:26:22 PM EST

Re: under sniper fire (none / 0)

Your summary of the Tuzla incident is revisionist.

The reason the Clinton camp is releasing this memo of Obama's exaggerations is because they have been caught exaggerating and are trying to show that they're not alone.

Some of the claims are valid. Others been refuted. Others seem like they are splitting hairs.

As for you opinion that the media is making too big an issue out of the Tuzla statements, that's Clinton's fault. If she would have said she "misspoke" on day one, it would have been over quickly. Instead, by my count she offered 4 different explanations, and the press reported each one anew. Her shifting rationale kept the story going and created an alternate storyline  regarding her honesty that was of her own making.


by jdusek on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 12:36:23 PM EST

Re: under sniper fire (none / 0)

YOU PEOPLE HAVE  BECOME THE 2000 CLINTON/GORE HATING MEDIA.

ITS LIKE YOUVE BEEN CLONED.


by John Wesley Hardin was a Friend to the Poor on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 12:57:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Your caps key is stuck. (none / 0)

You may need a new keyboard.


by Bob Johnson on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 01:56:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Your caps key is stuck. (none / 0)


YOU PEOPLE HAVE  BECOME THE 2000 CLINTON/GORE HATING MEDIA.

ITS LIKE YOUVE BEEN CLONED.


by John Wesley Hardin was a Friend to the Poor on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 03:39:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary and the Media: Under Enemy Fire (none / 0)

I cannot adequately state how important this diary is. It has my Highest Recommendation.


by Fleaflicker on Fri Mar 28, 2008 at 12:44:12 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.