
In Time, Mark Halperin provides a list of “Painful Things Hillary Clinton Knows—Or Should Know.”
No. 7:“The Rev. Wright story notwithstanding, the media still wants Obama to be the nominee—and that has an impact every day.”
We’ve come full circle. From destroying Gore in 2000, then demanding that he withdraw during the Florida recount, so confident have the Beltway media courtiers grown in their social and political status that what once was furiously denied is now boasted about. Politicians may come and go, but Chris Matthews, Howard Fineman, Tim Russert and Maureen Dowd preside over a permanent House of Lords. Remember, its the same media who attack Hillary now, attacked Gore in the same way then. The same media who now say Hillry must get out of this race for "the good of the Party", said in 2000 that Gore must quit and give he White House to Bush "for the good of the Nation".
And some foolish Democrats are listening to these fools. Why?
HAVE OBAMA PEOPLE BECOME THE SAME AS THE 2000 CLINTON/GORE HATING MEDIA. TOO ME, IT LOOKS LIKE THEY'VE BEEN CLONED.
Same attacks, same fake charges, same fake outrage, same motives...
----
Fox calls it "snipergate". It's all over the media. What began with a few bloggers, pushing a questionable youtube video with silly juxtapositions, made it into Fox, ABC, and now every major daily throughout the country. Obama's gangster's couldn't help themselves and are now dowsing the fire with propane.
As the major media outlets fall head-over-heals to slaughter Clinton fatale, not one is reporting the story correctly. It's the story of the century. "Hillary a Liar" "Hillary Caught" "Hillary Gaffe".
Welcome back to Hillary Season - we're back from our Spring break, back hunting Clintons - 2008 is Hillary season.
All the noise over another DailyKos orchestrated wave of propaganda: Hillary the Anti-Christ.
The entire media hoop-la over Clinton's "misstatement" is fabricated. What started with an inane video-posting, has been taken up by a vehemently anti-Hillary media, and when Wolfson mentioned "misstatement" in a daily conference call, bang- plastered all over the place.
That's fabrication, from start to finish, and with clear malicious intent. Just like when the Obama team dug up Ferraro's race statement in some far away local newspaper, and then pushed it into the airwaves. Fabricated from start to finish .
Any clearheaded reading of the Clinton camps statement on Bosnia, is pretty relaxing:
Clinton said I remember landing under sniper fire and that the welcoming ceremony had to be moved inside because of sniper fire.
All evidence from the time, as Wolfson made clear, documented sniper fire in the hills. How does that make "landing under sniper fire" a misstatement?
Is our national media seriously considering we take the words of Sinbad more seriously than Clinton, Wolfson, and contemporaneous reports all put together?
When the character of a Democratic candidate is held in lower regard than the mutterings of a flaky comedian gone AWOL in his military duty, you don't need do second-guess yourself- you are seeing bias at work.
*
The issue about the duration of the ceremony on the tarmac, is a non-issue. The YouTube video provides no evidence that the ceremony wasn`t in fact shorter than planned, nor does it devote any attention to the subject of whether and where such a ceremony continued during the day. It is a crappy internet video, with no relevant information, and open only to speculative conjectural interpretation by the types who believe in UFOs. To present their amateurish misinterpretations as proof of lying, misleading, and or exaggeration on Hillary's part, is daft. To do so at the national broadcasting level, is more than daft, or irresponsible, it is propaganda in its most brutal form.
The intent is all too clear- to not only provide Obama with the wherewithal of destroying Hillary's character, a wherewithal only the media posses, but to destroy Hillary's ability to make experience relevant to this Democratic Primary.
The media has already achieved a similar objective with "issues." When health care and NAFTA began to cause its dear wonderboy so much Obama anxiety, when it became painfully clear that "issues" were not his forte, suddenly coverage shifted to race-baiting. Who cares whether Obama lied on Goldsby and NAFTA, or Powers and Iraq?
I sincerely wish Obama's media whores and populous sheep, applied the same standards of integrity and honesty to Obama- that they've been applying to Hillary from about 2004.
Or wait, they can't do that- because unlike Hillary Obama has no experience of which to speak, hence nothing to ridicule? Passed 2 bills, did not convene a single meeting of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on NATO and Afghanistan and lost all his Chicago Senate papers? Attaboy.
Well, we know what they media said about those 11,000 pages of Hillary experience. Stained Blue Dress day anyone?
How is that for media objectivity? Hillary releases documents of her policy experience and the media bring up Lewinsky. Hillary talks about traveling to foreign countries, and the only thing making headlines is one misstatement distorted by the media into some kind of denunciation of Hillary's entire character.
And just in time to coincide with Obama's declared attack on Hillary's character? Coincidence?
Newsflash! People and politicans exaggerate.Lets all faint together in feigned shock!
Hell, Obama's lied a slew of times so far in this race, big deal, so what? (not that I care, but some are listed below to show how it is)
Whats shocking is one dem's campaign callng another dem a liar in the media.
Only one other Dem has ever done that before this.
That selfish fool bradley did this in 2000 and he set up the entire Gore is a liar media campaign.
Reemember, the same exact media players who did this to Gore are now doing this to Hillary.
WAY TO GO OBAMAITES!
You are becoming exactly what weve been fighting against since 2000.
FROM TALK LEFT:Obama's Exaggerations
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/3/27/ 212716/396
Just Embellished Words: Senator Obama's Record of Exaggerations & MisstatementsOnce again, the Obama campaign is getting caught saying one thing while doing another. They are personally attacking Hillary even though Sen. Obama has been found mispeaking and embellishing facts about himself more than ten times in recent months. Senator Obama's campaign is based on words - not a record of deeds - and if those words aren't backed up by facts, there's not much else left.
"Senator Obama has called himself a constitutional professor, claimed credit for passing legislation that never left committee, and apparently inflated his role as a community organizer among other issues. When it comes to his record, just words won't do. Senator Obama will have to use facts as well," Clinton spokesman Phil Singer said.
Sen. Obama consistently and falsely claims that he was a law professor. The Sun-Times reported that, "Several direct-mail pieces issued for Obama's primary [Senate] campaign said he was a law professor at the University of Chicago. He is not. He is a senior lecturer (now on leave) at the school. In academia, there is a vast difference between the two titles. Details matter." In academia, there's a significant difference: professors have tenure while lecturers do not. [Hotline Blog, 4/9/07; Chicago Sun-Times, 8/8/04]
Obama claimed credit for nuclear leak legislation that never passed. "Obama scolded Exelon and federal regulators for inaction and introduced a bill to require all plant owners to notify state and local authorities immediately of even small leaks. He has boasted of it on the campaign trail, telling a crowd in Iowa in December that it was 'the only nuclear legislation that Iâ<sup>TM</sup>ve passed.' 'I just did that last year,' he said, to murmurs of approval. A close look at the path his legislation took tells a very different story. While he initially fought to advance his bill, even holding up a presidential nomination to try to force a hearing on it, Mr. Obama eventually rewrote it to reflect changes sought by Senate Republicans, Exelon and nuclear regulators. The new bill removed language mandating prompt reporting and simply offered guidance to regulators, whom it charged with addressing the issue of unreported leaks. Those revisions propelled the bill through a crucial committee. But, contrary to Mr. Obamaâ<sup>TM</sup>s comments in Iowa, it ultimately died amid parliamentary wrangling in the full Senate." [New York Times, 2/2/08]
Obama misspoke about his being conceived because of Selma. âoeMr. Obama relayed a story of how his Kenyan father and his Kansan mother fell in love because of the tumult of Selma, but he was born in 1961, four years before the confrontation at Selma took place. When asked later, Mr. Obama clarified himself, saying: â<sup>~</sup>I meant the whole civil rights movement.â<sup>TM</sup>â [New York Times, 3/5/07]
LA Times: Fellow organizers say Sen. Obama took too much credit for his community organizing efforts. "As the 24-year-old mentor to public housing residents, Obama says he initiated and led efforts that thrust Altgeld's asbestos problem into the headlines, pushing city officials to call hearings and a reluctant housing authority to start a cleanup. But others tell the story much differently. They say Obama did not play the singular role in the asbestos episode that he portrays in the best-selling memoir 'Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance.' Credit for pushing officials to deal with the cancer-causing substance, according to interviews and news accounts from that period, also goes to a well-known preexisting group at Altgeld Gardens and to a local newspaper called the Chicago Reporter. Obama does not mention either one in his book." [Los Angeles Times, 2/19/07]
Chicago Tribune: Obama's assertion that nobody had indications Rezko was engaging in wrongdoing 'strains credulity.' "â¦Obama has been too self-exculpatory. His assertion in network TV interviews last week that nobody had indications Rezko was engaging in wrongdoing strains credulity: Tribune stories linked Rezko to questionable fundraising for Gov. Rod Blagojevich in 2004 -- more than a year before the adjacent home and property purchases by the Obamas and the Rezkos." [Chicago Tribune editorial, 1/27/08]
Obama was forced to revise his assertion that lobbyists 'won't work in my White House.' "White House hopeful Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) was forced to revise a critical stump line of his on Saturday -- a flat declaration that lobbyists 'won't work in my White House' after it turned out his own written plan says they could, with some restrictions⦠After being challenged on the accuracy of what he has been saying -- in contrast to his written pledge -- at a news conference Saturday in Waterloo, Obama immediately softened what had been his hard line in his next stump speech." [Chicago Sun-Times, 12/16/07]
FactCheck.org: â<sup>~</sup>Selective, embellished and out-of-context quotes from newspapers pump up Obama's health plan.â<sup>TM</sup> âoeObama's ad touting his health care plan quotes phrases from newspaper articles and an editorial, but makes them sound more laudatory and authoritative than they actually are. It attributes to The Washington Post a line saying Obama's plan would save families about $2,500. But the Post was citing the estimate of the Obama campaign and didn't analyze the purported savings independently. It claims that "experts" say Obama's plan is "the best." "Experts" turn out to be editorial writers at the Iowa City Press-Citizen â" who, for all their talents, aren't actual experts in the field. It quotes yet another newspaper saying Obama's plan "guarantees coverage for all Americans," neglecting to mention that, as the article makes clear, it's only Clinton's and Edwards' plans that would require coverage for everyone, while Obama's would allow individuals to buy in if they wanted to.â [FactCheck.org, 1/3/08]
Sen. Obama said 'I passed a law that put Illinois on a path to universal coverage,' but Obama health care legislation merely set up a task force. "As a state senator, I brought Republicans and Democrats together to pass legislation insuring 20,000 more children. And 65,000 more adults received health careâ¦And I passed a law that put Illinois on a path to universal coverage." The State Journal-Register reported in 2004 that "The [Illinois State] Senate squeaked out a controversial bill along party lines Wednesday to create a task force to study health-care reform in Illinois. [â¦] In its original form, the bill required the state to offer universal health care by 2007. That put a 'cloud' over the legislation, said Sen. Dale Righter, R-Mattoon. Under the latest version, the 29-member task force would hold at least five public hearings next year." [Obama Health Care speech, 5/29/07; State Journal-Register, 5/20/04]
ABC News: 'Obama...seemed to exaggerate the legislative progress he made' on ethics reform. "ABC News' Teddy Davis Reports: During Monday's Democratic presidential debate, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., seemed to exaggerate the legislative progress he has made on disclosure of "bundlers," those individuals who aggregate their influence with the candidate they support by collecting $2,300 checks from a wide network of wealthy friends and associates. When former Alaska Sen. Mike Gravel alleged that Obama had 134 bundlers, Obama responded by telling Gravel that the reason he knows how many bundlers he has raising money for him is "because I helped push through a law this past session to disclose that." Earlier this year, Obama sponsored an amendment [sic] in the Senate requiring lobbyists to disclose the candidates for whom they bundle. Obama's amendment would not, however, require candidates to release the names of their bundlers. What's more, although Obama's amendment was agreed to in the Senate by unanimous consent, the measure never became law as Obama seemed to suggest. Gravel and the rest of the public know how many bundlers Obama has not because of a 'law' that the Illinois Democrat has 'pushed through' but because Obama voluntarily discloses that information." [ABC News, 7/23/07]
Obama drastically overstated Kansas tornado deaths during campaign appearance. When Sen. Barack Obama exaggerated the death toll of the tornado in Greensburg, Kan, during his visit to Richmond yesterday, The Associated Press headline rapidly evolved from Obama visits former Confederate capital for fundraiser to Obama rips Bush on Iraq war at Richmond fundraiser to <sup>~</sup>Weary Obama criticizes Bush on Iraq, drastically overstates Kansas tornado death toll to Obama drastically overstates Kansas tornado deaths during campaign appearance. Drudge made it a banner, ensuring no reporter would miss it. [politico.com, 5/9/07]
.
|
|
|
Permalink :: 23 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.